WebRTC vs Agora: What to Choose and Key Differences
  • Updated: 04 Dec 2024

WebRTC vs Agora: What to Choose and Key Differences

Selecting a correct framework when creating real-time communication applications may greatly affect the outcome of the project. Two of such technologies are WebRTC (Web Real-Time Communication) and Agora which are both powerful, but equipped with different features for different purposes. In this blog, we will give more insights into the major distinctions between WebRTC and Agora to provide useful guidelines for considering the best platform for your next mobile application.

What is WebRTC?

WebRTC is an open-source project for the implementation of real-time web communication (RTC) from browser and mobile applications. It allows audio, video, and data exchanges between browsers with no plugins or extra software. WebRTC is an open-source platform that offers quite a lot of flexibility for web developers who may need to develop communication features that will fit their intended use.

Key Features of WebRTC

  1. Open-Source:WebRTC is open-source which means it is free to use and is supported by a great number of people worldwide. This makes it an open-source project, which can be incorporated into different projects and does not incur charges when signing a license deal something likely to benefit startup companies and businesses that are likely to experience financial constraints.
  2. Browser Compatibility:WebRTC works seamlessly across most modern web browsers which include, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. This broad compatibility makes it perfect for web developers who wish to add real-time communication features on sites without worrying about cross-browser issues
  3. Peer-to-Peer Communication: Peer-to-peer connection is the type of connection that WebRTC is created to provide to the users. This connection is much faster and provides less delay and hence is used for applications that need real-time response and energy efficiency such as video conferencing and online gaming.
  4. Flexibility: WebRTC includes a set of APIs to extend communication capabilities giving web developers the tools to create bespoke solutions. This lends the creation of highly specific, which is especially useful if you are working on a basic chat application or a more sophisticated video-conferencing solution.

What is Agora?

Agora is an all-in-one real-time engagement solution for mobile app developers with SDKs (Software Development Kits) for voice, video, and live streaming integration into iOS/Android apps and Web applications. Web RTC is a peer-to-peer technology of communication while agora is a commercial web-based version apt to host multinational and high-quality real-time communication. For this reason, when developers are required to create complex, scalable apps, Agora readily provides what they are looking for.

Key Features of Agora:

  1. High-Quality Communication:Agora also has a network of data centers from around the world to make certain that the quality and low-latency audio and video occurring. This messaging network is designed for handling real-time messages thereby giving its users a real-time response thats free from delays or reduced fidelity in poor network conditions.
  2. Scalability:Agora is meant to host many attendees and it is perfect for event broadcasting, teaching and learning in online classes, and massive virtual conferences. This scalability is important, especially for businesses that anticipate rapid growth in their applications or for those that target many users.
  3. Ease of Use:Agora offers simple-to-use API to enable the incorporation of Real-time communication Experience in mobile applications and Web applications. These SDKs have gotten to include hospitalized functions which help the programmers to save on time and code as they concentrate on other aspects of mobile application development.
  4. Support and Reliability: Finally, as a commercial product, Agora provides its clients with good customer support which may be very helpful when working with applications that are critical to a business. Regarding its reliability, the platform has a strong infrastructure to support it in performing well in different geographical areas and applications.

Unlock your business's full potential! Discover Digittrix's insights on custom web development and take your business to the next level.

Key Differences Between WebRTC and Agora

Cost

WebRTC: Some benefits of using WebRTC are also that it is an open-source project, which is free of charge for web developers or businesses. But For people who are creating a big portal or a social network, there can be expenses on server creation and maintenance.

Agora: Agora provides features on a paid basis charging operations based on minutes used, number of participants, and additional services such as live streaming. This cost structure is something that has to be taken into account especially when it comes to applications that are large scale or applications that are used frequently.

Ease of Integration

WebRTC: WebRTC plays well in developers’ hands but they have to do many settings and configurations on their own, which can be considered both a strength and weakness. However, this results in more flexible architecture and more flexibility should come with the burden of increasing web developers’ understanding of the technology.

Agora: Agora’s SDKs are developed to be as simple as possible because the company offers out-of-the-box solutions that can be easily implemented. This is normally helpful in shortening the development cycle and easing it, beneficial in the case of a team that wants to release a product into the market very soon.

Scalability

WebRTC: Scaling WebRTC by the nature of the peer-to-peer system is suitable for applications with a limited number of users but can prove to be difficult when the number of participants is large. For example, when the users initiate a big group video call, extra infrastructure like a Selective Forwarding Unit (SFU) must be utilized to deal with lots of stream flows.

Agora: Agora is very scalable, which means that the design of the program is made to cater to future expansion. It can easily work with applications that have many simultaneous users, and this makes it suitable for occasions, such as conferences, and online classes, among others that require high scalability.

Performance

WebRTC: The functionality of WebRTC does not remain constant due to which it greatly depends on the Internet connection and the server side. Because it is based on the direct connections between users the communication quality depends on the distance between the parties, and the stability of the network.

Agora: Still, Agora boasts better consistency of its performance due to the presence of its network scale around the entire globe. This helps to reduce and control the break times average while improving the quality of communication that is to be done regardless of the time or the place of the users making it suitable for important operations.

Customization

WebRTC: WebRTC is very flexible and it's the strength of developers. Developers have fully fledged management over the communication stack whereby they are in a position to fully design unique solutions that are ideal for their commercial ventures.

Agora: Hence, we can define Agora’s approach as a more traditional one, and what it provides is a solid, black-box neutrally tested pipeline. This may be a drawback if, for instance, you are working on a project that needs to have certain features that are not offered by Agora’s SDKs.

Use Cases and Applications

WebRTC Use Cases

  1. One-to-One Video Calls: Best suited to the design of a p2p service or application where one peer talks directly to another.
  2. Web Conferencing: That is why with additional server facilities, WebRTC can be used for group meetings.
  3. File Sharing: WebRTC data channels are very important for sending files securely and between two peers only.

Agora Use Cases

  1. Large-Scale Live Streaming: One of the main applications of Agora is to broadcast to a large number of users, for such purposes as online events, webinars,s or concerts.
  2. Virtual Classrooms: The incorporation of social learning features has made Agora suitable for use in e-learning institutions.
  3. Gaming: In the majority of multiplayer gaming, voice, and video communication in real-time is crucial, and Agora has perfectly addressed it.
  4. Healthcare Teleconferencing: Described below are key aspects of Agora’s building block that make the technology secure for use in telemedicine applications; The Agora building block is scalable making it ideal for telemedicine.

Which One is Better for You?

  1. Opt for WebRTC if you are a web developer working on a small—to medium-ranging project and want an affordable, scalable, and more volte-face solution for real-time communication. WebRTC is especially beneficial in cases where an application is reliant on Web browsers or needs help from the source community for development.
  2. Select Agora if you require high stability, scalability, and application-level quality, with little or no development cost implication. Now it’s time to discuss when you should use Agora. Moreover, it is perfect for mobile app development tasks that involve fast and efficient real-time communication across the world, for example, live streaming services, educational applications, or massive online events.

Final Words

WebRTC and Agora are strong real-time communication tools, yet they are designed for various purposes.

If WebRTC is sufficient for the plan and doesn’t require more features, then one could stick with WebRTC, otherwise, in case you need more features and have the resources to pay for using Agora – go for it. So if you want full control, need to be cheap, and your application does not need to scale a lot, WebRTC is totally for you. On the other hand, if you require more sophisticated features, seamless integration capabilities, and a high volume of communication Agora provides a more complete, controlled client API.

Each of them is well suited for its domain, so the choice between them depends on the size of your audience, your technological capabilities, and the required functionality.

Build a Real-Time Communication App with Digittrix

When building a real-time communication app, choosing between WebRTC and Agora is crucial. WebRTC offers customizable, peer-to-peer connections without plugins, while Agora provides a scalable platform with advanced features like live streaming and recording. If you're looking to develop your web or mobile app with the perfect technology, contact Digittrix.

If you want to build a top-notch app, digittrix can help you make the right choice. We are a leading web and mobile app development Company with 14 years of Experience and expert developers at DIGITTRIX!

If you too want to build an app and are unsure of how to begin the process, schedule your appointment or book your consultation today with our expert technical managers by calling +91 8727000867

or write to us for all your queries at digittrix@gmail.com

digittrix development experience more than 10 years

Digittrix Blog Author Image

Written by Vandana Abrol
An enthusiastic developer and skilled business management expert with over a decade of experience in the field

Do you need help in Mobile App development?

Blog img Blog img Blog img Blog img

Join over 1500+ businesses we've already helped!

Table of Contents

    FAQ About WebRTC vs Agora: What to Choose and Key Differences

    WebRTC or Web Real-Time Communication is an open-sourced technology that allows real-time P2P sharing of multimedia content without the need for a third-party software plug-in in the browser. It is best for developers who wish to have a more flexible solution with complete control over the overall structure of the application.

    Agora offers a more comprehensive and scalable platform, including advanced features like real-time video and audio broadcasting, interactive live streaming, and recording. It’s a more plug-and-play solution, making it easier for developers to integrate and scale their apps quickly.

    In live streaming, the Agora solution is more enhanced in scalability, latency preference, and other features such as engagement tools in real-time. However, WebRTC is better for one-on-one contact as all customization can be completed at one’s leisure.

    Yes, it’s possible to switch from WebRTC to Agora, yet, there might be certain steps in your app’s design that will need changes to be made to do so; this is mostly if you have developed a major part of the project using WebRTC. Such a transition is better discussed with experts like Digittrix before making a change to a mobile website.

    Latest

    From Our Blogs

    View All
    img

    ©2024Digittrix Infotech Private Limited , All rights reserved.